爱上海,上海419论坛,上海龙凤419 - Powered by Bernita Daio!

    Faculty Panel reexamines Core Curriculum

    • Home
    • /
    • jyrlbcac
    • /
    • Faculty Panel reexamines Core Curriculum

    Faculty Panel reexamines Core Curriculum

    By Admin

    • jyrlbcac ,
    • Tags: 上海哪里还能TY, 君悦富侨意境spa 398, 夜上海论坛SL, 松江同乐网还有吗, 松江大学城附近足浴店, 浦东外卖工作室, 爱上海DX, 爱上海E, 爱上海ET, 爱上海NW, 爱上海UC, 苏州夜网 吴江
    • 26 Jan

    first_imgEvery 10 years, the University of Notre Dame undergoes a rigorous review of its core curriculum, the set of courses that every student is required to take in order to establish a common foundation in learning, according to the Core Curriculum Review website.This year’s review process launched with University President Fr. John Jenkins and University Provost Thomas Burish appointing John McGreevy, dean of the College of Arts and Letters, and Gregory Crawford, dean of the College of Science, as co-chairs of the Decennial Core Curriculum Review Committee in August 2014, according to the Core Curriculum Review website. The committee includes 12 additional faculty members from multiple departments of the University.In order to engage faculty in the inspection process, the Committee hosted open faculty forums throughout the academic year, per the website. The most recent forum was held in the McKenna Hall auditorium Tuesday night. McGreevy began the meeting by outlining the purpose of the Review Committee and the importance of faculty feedback in the process.“One thing to observe about these requirements is that they haven’t changed in forty years,” McGreevy said. “These are the requirements that came into being at Notre Dame and also, roughly, at Boston College and Georgetown [University], in the early 1970s.”The core curriculum is the foundation of the Notre Dame education, McGreevy said, and thus, the review of the curriculum is crucial.“If I were to characterize [the committee’s] conversations … I think the things we have talked the most about are, ‘What is it that we want students to have when they graduate? What knowledge, dispositions and skills?’” McGreevy said.McGreevy said students may need a range of particular courses that fine tune writing and oration skills.McGreevy said the University needs to examine “how best can [courses] be substantiated — incorporating certain requirements and organizational structures — from academic advising to the relationship between [the] First Year of Studies [program] and the colleges and schools.”Other questions under consideration by the Committee include how to sustain and deepen the University’s commitment to its Catholic character and how to integrate core curriculum requirements with major requirements, McGreevy said. Faculty members were then invited to share their thoughts on these questions.Associate professor of political science Debra Javeline proposed a sustainability requirement for the core curriculum.“We are all deeply concerned about the sustainable issues of environmental change and whether our students come out of Notre Dame to participate in the conversation,” Javeline said.While review of the curriculum is a beneficial activity, it also runs the risk of losing sight of what the University already does well, said Jean Porter, John A. O’Brien professor of theology.“Notre Dame is an institution that prides itself on giving our undergraduates a first-rate, humanistic education,” Porter said. “We initiate them into certain critical thought, we initiate them into the learnings of the Church, and I think we do it at a very high level.”Theology professor Gary Anderson called for reforms to the structure of introductory classes so that students not be required to take as many beginning classes with graduate students.“When I arrived in 2003 and began teaching the intro course, I was told I had to do the University seminar with 17 students because we have to have senior faculty members teaching those seminars,” Anderson said. “Plus, the University requires us to fund our fifth-year graduate students by putting them in these classes, so we are forced to do this.”Elizabeth Mazurek, associate professor of classics, spoke on the importance of languages being included in the potentially new core curriculum.“I think that if you were to explore a thematic requirement of diversity, foreign language would be perfect,” Mazurek said. “You would not be forcing all students to take so many semesters of a language requirement, but it would be an option for diversity exploration.“… The Catholic Church is a world church and if we are to talk about ecological literacy, I think we also have to talk about world language literacy.”Other topics discussed at the forum included the election of faculty members to the Committee, rather than the current system of appointments, and the integration of different disciplines within the core curriculum.The Committee will open up to student feedback beginning next week, as there will be an open discussion on the place of theology in the core curriculum at 7 p.m. Monday night in Geddes Hall.Tags: Core Curriculum, Core Curriculum Review, Decennial Core Curriculum Review Committee, Open Forum, requirementslast_img

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

      Recent Posts

    • Distribution watch

      21 April 2021

    • FSA targets bakery for front-of-pack labelling

      21 April 2021

    • White plus joins wraps

      21 April 2021

    • Adams aids health values

      21 April 2021

    • Reporting in Inside the corridors of power

      21 April 2021

    Recent Comments

    • Accelerator on n those years we worked together with the promotion of Forum
    • ZapotekSpoot on n those years we worked together with the promotion of Forum
    • Irina on n those years we worked together with the promotion of Forum
    • Xardasadhendy on n those years we worked together with the promotion of Forum
    • Jamesplumb on n those years we worked together with the promotion of Forum

    Archives

    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • May 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017

    Categories

    • ancsqaie
    • atvpjgvi
    • bcongbdl
    • cukiadqk
    • dfuvkkzq
    • dyozqglk
    • eswimvio
    • fhcwlcre
    • hacimwdw
    • jbliycpr
    • jyrlbcac
    • lkituini
    • lytncosp
    • optbnofm
    • qucrcmry
    • rvxcvfwb
    • srbwztfm
    • teazupkl
    • tztghzui
    • uoqlmdqb
    • xlhrkxbe
    • ysxvxzir
    • zijvbkaj
    • zrnpcmud

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Powered By Impressive Business WordPress Theme