爱上海,上海419论坛,上海龙凤419 - Powered by Bernita Daio!

    Prosecutor’s Office declines to prosecute in Seeberg case

    • Home
    • /
    • lkituini
    • /
    • Prosecutor’s Office declines to prosecute in Seeberg case

    Prosecutor’s Office declines to prosecute in Seeberg case

    By Admin

    • lkituini ,
    • Tags: 上海花千坊1314, 宁波彩虹北路玑遇SPA, 深圳 品花楼, 爱上海AS, 爱上海CE, 爱上海QG, 爱上海RL, 苏州品茶资源, 苏州哪个会所是可以做的, 苏州最高档夜总会排名, 西安品茶2020, 闵行洗浴全套可以口的会所
    • 26 Jan

    first_imgThe St. Joseph County Prosecutor’s Office has declined to prosecute after reviewing the investigation of sexual battery allegations brought by Elizabeth “Lizzy” Seeberg. Seeberg alleged that a Notre Dame student-athlete sexually assaulted her on Aug. 31. The first year Saint Mary’s student died of an apparent suicide on Sept. 10. The Office announced in a release today that the decision not to prosecute is based on an investigation done by the Notre Dame Security Police (NDSP). The police force turned the investigation over to the Prosecutor’s Office on Sept. 17. According to the release, Seeberg filed an allegation of sexual battery. She also filed a complaint about a Sept. 2 text message about the incident from a friend of the suspect, also a Notre Dame student. NDSP took statements from Seeberg, a female friend and the two suspects. The investigating officers also recovered the text message. The release stated that the Office is not prosecuting the suspect on the accusation of sexual battery based on the evidence from the investigation and evidentiary rules involving hearsay, which make it unlikely that Seeberg’s statements would be admissible in court because of her death. The Office also determined that the text message does not meet requirements for harassment under Indiana law. Seeberg’s parents met with officials in the Prosecutor’s Office on Dec. 1 to discuss the investigation, according to the release. In an e-mail to the Notre Dame community Thursday, Jan Botz, vice president of the Office of Public Affairs and Communications, said the University cannot comment on the allegations. She cited the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), which prohibits universities from publicly discussing specific disciplinary cases, she said in the e-mail. Notre Dame will continue to follow its internal investigation processes, University spokesman Dennis Brown said in a Thursday statement. “Notre Dame takes allegations about potential violations of the law or University policy very seriously and that’s exactly why we have such a thorough process in place to pursue the facts and make determinations about right or wrong,” he said. “The prosecutor also has a process in place in which he knows all of the facts. He has made a decision and issued a statement that speaks for itself.”last_img

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

      Recent Posts

    • Distribution watch

      21 April 2021

    • FSA targets bakery for front-of-pack labelling

      21 April 2021

    • White plus joins wraps

      21 April 2021

    • Adams aids health values

      21 April 2021

    • Reporting in Inside the corridors of power

      21 April 2021

    Recent Comments

    • Accelerator on n those years we worked together with the promotion of Forum
    • ZapotekSpoot on n those years we worked together with the promotion of Forum
    • Irina on n those years we worked together with the promotion of Forum
    • Xardasadhendy on n those years we worked together with the promotion of Forum
    • Jamesplumb on n those years we worked together with the promotion of Forum

    Archives

    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • May 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017

    Categories

    • ancsqaie
    • atvpjgvi
    • bcongbdl
    • cukiadqk
    • dfuvkkzq
    • dyozqglk
    • eswimvio
    • fhcwlcre
    • hacimwdw
    • jbliycpr
    • jyrlbcac
    • lkituini
    • lytncosp
    • optbnofm
    • qucrcmry
    • rvxcvfwb
    • srbwztfm
    • teazupkl
    • tztghzui
    • uoqlmdqb
    • xlhrkxbe
    • ysxvxzir
    • zijvbkaj
    • zrnpcmud

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Powered By Impressive Business WordPress Theme